|
Sir Robert Heath was His Majesty's Attorney General from 1625
to 1631 for King Charles I.
His/Her Majesty's Attorney General for England and Wales,
usually known as the Attorney General, is the chief legal adviser
of the Crown in England and Wales. He represents the King/Queen
and the Government in court, and has supervisory powers over
prosecutions, which are the responsibility of the Director of
Public Prosecutions and the Crown Prosecution Service. The Attorney
General also represents the Crown in many judicial proceedings
relating to the public interest, e.g. the administration of charities
and income tax. He is assisted by the Solicitor General: both
offices are filled by political appointees who must belong to
either house of Parliament, but unlike in former times the Attorney
General is not usually now a member of the Cabinet, but is called
to advise it when necessary.
The Attorney General and the Solicitor General, despite their
titles (an attorney in the common law courts was the equivalent
of a solicitor in the courts of equity), are invariably barristers
and King's/Queen's Counsel. The Attorney General has precedence
over all other barristers in the English Courts, and in the House
of Lords has precedence over the Lord Advocate, even in Scottish
cases. The Attorney General is addressed in court as "Mr
Attorney." On October 30, 1629, in the fifth
year of his reign, King Charles exercised his right by granting
to his attorney general, Sir Robert Heath, the territory between
31 degrees and 36 degrees North latitude. This is the region
lying from about thirty miles north of the Florida state line
to the southern side of Albemarle Sound in North Carolina. Except
for Roanoke Island it did not include the territory already explored
by Virginians.
Heath held this vast domain from the Atlantic to the Pacific
as sole proprietor. He was described in his charter as being
"kindled with a certain laudable and pious desire as well
of enlarging the Christian religion as our Empire, and increasing
the Trade and Commerce of this our Kingdom." The charter
also noted that Heath was "about to lead thither a Colony
of men, large and plentiful, professing the true religion, sedulously
and industriously applying themselves to the culture of the said
lands and to merchandizing; to be performed and at his own charges,
and others by his example." At the same time, King Charles
granted the whole of the Bahamas to Sir Robert Heath.
Heath's Carolana charter contained the provision known as
the "Bishop of Durham clause" which gave him broad
feudal powers equal to any ever held by the bishop of the County
of Durham in England on the Scottish frontier. The bishop there
was expected to protect the country from Scottish invaders, and
he had power to raise and maintain an army, to collect taxes,
and to do many other things which gave him almost royal power
within his county.
In his American province Heath could also "confer favours,
graces, and honours" upon deserving citizens, but any titles
of nobility bestowed must be different from those in use in England.
Laws for the province were to be made "according to the
wholesome directions of and with the counsel, assent, and approbation
of the Freeholders ... or the Major part of them."
King Charles declared the region granted to Heath to be a
province and he named it Carolana for himself.
At one point in the charter it is also referred to as New
Carolana. Heath was directed to have ready in his province
for the use of the king or his successors, in case they should
enter Carolana, a 20-ounce "Circle of Gold, formed in the
fashion of a crown ... with this inscription engraved upon it,
deus coronet opus suum."
Sir Robert Heath may not have acted entirely on his own initiative.
The charter, however, says that he "humbly supplicated that
all that Region . . . may be given ... to Him ... by our Royal
Highness." He certainly knew something of the country, for
he was a member of the council of the Virginia Company and owned
land in the colony to which he sent tenants. For several years
he also had been closely associated with officials in Virginia
concerned with the production, inspection, and sale of tobacco.
As a high legal officer he had been active in the dissolution
of the company's charter. In the summer of 1624, a few months
after Virginia became a royal colony, Heath aided King James
in his efforts to make the tobacco trade a royal monopoly. He
drew up a contract with the "planters and adventurers of
these colonies for their tobacco to be delivered for the king's
use." This scheme was not adopted, but Heath kept his hands
in the tobacco trade, nevertheless. At Jamestown in 1627 instructions
from Heath concerning the shipping of tobacco were read before
the General Court. Incidentally, Heath was also involved in New
England affairs. It was Sir Robert Heath who had
held John Lilburne captive during the Civil Wars when protestors
rose up to threaten the lives of Royalist prisoners if Heath
harmed the life of John Lilburne. On November 22, 1645 Parliament
stripped the Royalist Heath of all of his possessions as though
he was already a dead man. These possessions included the patent
for the Province of the Carolanas. Heath fled to France where
he died in 1649 and in that same year the victorious Roundheads
executed King Charles I and declared England to be a republic
and it retained that status until 1660 under a succession of
different forms of government headed by Oliver Cromwell and then
his son. Because Sir Robert Heath had his property
stripped from him as though he were a dead man when he fled abroad
in 1645, interest in the Province of the Carolanas was lost.
For his part, Oliver Cromwell took an interest in developing
the northeast coast of America, he paid no attention to the Carolana
territory. Consequently by 1663 the territory was looked upon
as unsettled and this meant that the patent could be awarded
again. This time Charles II granted a patent to a few people
who had assisted in the reestablishment of the monarchy.
This action provoked the heirs of Sir Robert Heath to also
clamour for a restoration of their own rights, since Heath had
been loyal to Charles I. Although legal battles raged on in British
courts over the rival claims, no one gave any thought about previous
attempts at settlement until 1986.
Questions about the relationship between king,
law, and parliament, which could be traced back to the 1530s,
remained prominent in early Stuart politics. Focusing on the
parliamentary reaction to the decision by the King's Bench judges
to refuse bail to the Five Knights who were imprisoned by order
of Charles I for objecting to the Forced Loan of 1626-27, it
is argued that the agitation leading to the passage of the Petition
of Right was caused primarily by John Selden's allegation that
Attorney General Heath, on orders from the king, intended to
enroll a form of judgment in the court record that would have
made a binding precedent in favour of the royal prerogative even
though the judges themselves expressly forbade him from doing
so. When Virginia became a royal province the unoccupied
territory south, as well as north, of the latitude of Point Comfort
again became subject to grant by the king. In 1629, not far from
the time when Lord Baltimore was prospecting in Virginia, the
first Carolina grant was made1 to Sir Robert Heath, attorney-general
and afterwards chief justice of common pleas. Though he had been
concerned in the dissolution of the London company and was one
of the royal commissioners appointed after the revocation of
the charter for the government of Virginia, Heath never took
sufficient interest in colonization to undertake the settlement
of his province.
A plan in which the Vassalls, a prominent Puritan family to
which reference has already been made, were interested for the
settlement of a body of Huguenot refugees within its limits failed.
After that Sir Robert Heath assigned his interest in the province,
according to one account, to Samuel Vassall and to the heirs
of Sir Richard Grenville, and according to another to Lord Maltravers,
the heir of the Earl of Arundel, from whom it passed to the Duke
of Norfolk and his family. Both claims were quite shadowy. Though
the province was thus neglected by the immediate grantees, the
faint beginnings of settlement were made within the northern
part of the region by emigrants from Virginia, while certain
New Englanders became interested in trade and colonization near
Cape Fear. Thus early, and in both these localities, a certain
nonconformist trend was given to the development of the province.
|